The Science

Let’s talk about nuclear.

Nuclear reactors, like most power plants, make electricity in a pretty simple way: by generating heat to create steam, which drives a turbine. The different methods of generating heat, however, make a great difference in the design and its impact on the environment.

Fossil fuel plants produce heat by burning coal, oil, or natural gas. These fuels can provide cheap electricity, but they also generate large amounts of carbon dioxide and other pollutants.

Nuclear reactors generate their heat via nuclear fission. This process unlocks vast amounts of energy from a small amount of fuel, and doesn’t generate carbon dioxide. In the core of the reactor there is a large, stable number of nuclear fission reactions, which occur when a uranium atom is struck by a neutron and splits in two, releasing additional neutrons and energy in the form of heat.

Today, almost all nuclear reactors worldwide are one type: the light water reactor. We are challenging the status quo by bringing back and improving upon a different design from the earliest days of the nuclear industry: the molten salt reactor.





Light water reactors are fueled by pellets of solid uranium oxide, supported within a thin metal framework. The metal cladding traps fission products, which ultimately stop the nuclear chain reaction. Furthermore, the metal cladding, and the solid fuel itself, are damaged by the radiation in the reactor core. The buildup of fission products and accumulation of damage limit the amount of time that uranium oxide fuel can remain in a light water reactor to about four years.





Molten salt reactors like Transatomic Power’s are fueled by uranium dissolved in a liquid salt. The fuel is not surrounded by cladding, making it possible to continuously remove the fission products that would otherwise stop the nuclear reaction. The liquid fuel is also much more resistant to structural damage from radiation than solid materials – simply, liquids have very little structure to be damaged. With proper filtration, liquid fuel can remain in a molten salt reactor for decades, allowing us to extract much more of its energy.

Light Water Reactors

Waste Production

10 tons/yr


Four years is not long enough to use up all the energy in the uranium fuel – light water reactors can use only about 4% of their available energy. This inefficiency leads to the production of approximately 10 tons of long-lived radioactive waste per year.

Molten Salt Reactors

Waste Production

1.5 tons/yr


Our reactor consumes nuclear fuel slowly and thoroughly, over the course of decades. Our extremely efficient fuel utilization means that we produce much less waste per year than a light water reactor, reducing the total volume of waste by over 80%.

Light Water Reactors

Walk-away safe?



Light water reactors require a continuous supply of external electric power to pump water over their core, to keep it from heating up catastrophically. The most advanced light water reactor designs can survive without electricity for up to 72 hours, but after this time, they require operator action to restore their electric power. Without this outside intervention, they would suffer fuel damage and, potentially, a meltdown.

Molten Salt Reactors

Walk-away safe?



Molten salt reactors have significantly different cooling requirements than light water reactors. They are therefore extremely safe, and do not require active cooling, even in the worst-case accident scenarios. At the bottom of their primary loop, they have a “freeze valve” – a plug of the same type of salt in the primary loop, only electrically cooled so that it remains solid. If the plant loses electric power, the freeze valve loses its cooling and melts. The salt from the reactor then drains into an auxiliary containment. In the auxiliary containment, the salt is no longer in a critical configuration, and thus is not producing as much heat. It gradually cools via natural convection and freezes solid over the course of a few hours. If our reactor loses all electric power during an accident, even if the operators are no longer on site, it will gradually coast to a safe stop.

Light Water Reactors

Operates at:


Light water reactors operate at about 100 times atmospheric pressure. The high pressure is necessary to keep their water coolant liquid at their high operating temperatures. They also require the use of a large, expensive containment dome to hold this pressure in the case of an accident, and prevent the spread of radioactivity beyond the site boundary.

Molten Salt Reactors

Operates at:

Atmospheric Pressure

Molten salt remains liquid at atmospheric pressure, even at the very high temperatures present in a nuclear reactor. Since it is at atmospheric pressure, the design does not require a full containment dome, and in case of an accident, there is no pressure to act as a driving force to push radioactive material beyond the site boundary.

Let’s use the technology of today to better the future.

The 1960s Oak Ridge Molten Salt reactor was proven to be extremely safe, but it was expensive, required highly enriched fuel, and had a low power density. We’ve modified this design to make it more compact, more affordable, and more power-dense than the original, while retaining its tremendous safety benefits. Furthermore, our modifications allow our design to tap into the immense amounts of energy left behind in spent nuclear fuel, and use this waste as a fuel source.
1960s Design


The 1960s molten salt reactor used graphite as a moderator, but they required 90% of their core volume to be graphite. These bulky cores had a very low power density.
Our Design


Zirconium Hydride

Our design uses a zirconium hydride moderator, which is much more effective at slowing down neutrons. Only 50% of our core has to be moderator, allowing us to fit five times as much salt in the core, and thereby giving us a much more compact and power-dense design.

1960s Design


The early molten salt reactor used a lithium fluoride and beryllium fluoride salt. Only a small amount of uranium could be dissolved in this salt, so it was necessary to enrich the uranium fuel to high levels of uranium-235.
Our Design



We instead use a lithium fluoride – uranium fluoride salt, which can hold about 27 times as much uranium. Having more uranium in the salt, coupled with having more salt in the core, enables us to maintain criticality using either very low-enriched uranium or spent nuclear fuel.

1960s Design


Uranium is only commercially available at enrichments below 20%. Uranium enriched above 90% is classified as weapons-grade.
Our Design


As Low As 1.2%

Our reactor uses neutrons so efficiently that it can maintain criticality using either low-enriched fresh uranium fuel, or the residual fissile material in spent nuclear fuel. Low-enriched uranium is much less expensive to produce than higher enrichments, and does not present a weapons proliferation risk.

1960s Design

4 MW th/m3

Our Design


82 MW th/m3

Our high power density makes our reactor very compact — it is therefore less expensive to manufacture and easier to ship.

Commercial Plant Details

Reactor Type: Molten Salt Fueled Reactor
Fuel: Uranium or spent nuclear fuel (SNF)
Fuel Salt: LiF-based salt
Moderator: Zirconium Hydride
Neutron Spectrum: Thermal/Epithermal
Thermal Capacity: 1250 MWth
Gross Electric Capacity: 550 MWe
Net Electric Capacity: 520 MWe
Outlet Temperature: 650 Degrees (C)
Gross Thermal Efficiency: 44% using steam cycle with reheat
Long-lived Actinide Waste: Over 80% less than LWR
Station Blackout Safety: Walkaway safe without outside intervention
Overnight Cost: $2 billion
Mode of Operation: Typically for base load; May be used for load following

Additional technical details, including our neutronics simulations and materials selection, can be found in our technical white paper.